Legislative Update - February 22, 2024
Reminder: Anti-Price Gouging Rules Extended for February Storms
As of now, Imperial County has anti-price going rules in place through March 3, while San Diego and Riverside Counties will have the regulations in place through March 5. These emergencies can be extended by the Governor. Visit the SCRHA website for more information.
SCRHA Advocacy Encourages National City Council to Delay Tenant Flood Protections
On Tuesday, February 20, the National City Mayor and City Council reviewed potential tenant protections that would go beyond the existing protections in the County Flood Eviction and Rent Cap Moratorium. After lengthy testimony and discussion, the Council voted to delay action and have city staff return with more data and possible language for an ordinance to be reviewed by the council at a later meeting. Click here if you missed the SCRHA update.
Chula Vista Council Approves Mandated Changes to TPO; Asks Staff to Return with Specific Discussion Items
On Tuesday, February 20, the Chula Vista City Council was presented with draft changes to the city’s Tenant Protection Ordinance (TPO) that are necessary to remain in compliance with State Law (SB 567) that goes into effect on April 1, 2024. The council also asked city staff to return within 6 months with options for reducing requirements for housing providers in specific cases, such as the time a unit must be vacant when completing a substantial remodel. The current definition for substantial remodel establishes that a unit must be vacated for 60 days to complete improvements. Concern was expressed that this may pose a barrier for smaller properties and units where might be able to be completed sooner. SCRHA will continue to work with the city on improvements to the TPO.
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Rent Control Case
Earlier this week the Supreme Court refused to hear a case challenging New York’s Rent Control law. While the case is specific to New York, a decision by the court could have nation-wide impacts. At least one Justice indicated that the case should be heard in the future. Read more.
ICYMI: